For U.S. forces, which of the following are considered domestic sources of authority?

The correct choice identifies the U.S. Constitution, written statutes, and judicial decisions as domestic sources of authority for U.S. forces. This is accurate because these elements collectively establish the legal framework within which military forces operate domestically.

The U.S. Constitution serves as the supreme law of the land, outlining the foundational principles and the structure of U.S. government, including the roles and limitations of military authority. Written statutes, which are laws enacted by legislative bodies, further expand on and specify the parameters within which military operations must occur. Judicial decisions, including interpretations of the Constitution and statutes, help clarify and shape the application of these laws in practical scenarios. Together, they form a comprehensive set of domestic authorities that govern how U.S. military forces conduct themselves in relation to civilian entities and under the law.

In contrast, options that specify only one aspect—like just judicial decisions or only written statutes—fail to capture the full scope of the legal authority. The inclusion of international treaties and agreements in another option goes beyond domestic authority, as these are relevant in international contexts rather than being sources of domestic law for U.S. forces. Thus, recognizing the combination of the Constitution, statutes, and judicial decisions provides a complete understanding of the domestic sources of