Which is NOT a recognized limitation of Tactical Control (TACON)?

The recognition of limitations within Tactical Control (TACON) revolves around the scope and nature of control that is typically associated with tactical-level operations. TACON is characterized by the ability to provide detailed local direction and control, especially concerning units engaged in direct operations to achieve specific tactical objectives.

The limitation of TACON in relation to strategic military assets highlights a fundamental distinction between tactical and strategic levels of command. Strategic military assets typically require broader decision-making and overarching control that goes beyond the locality and immediacy of tactical operations. Therefore, control over strategic military assets does not align with the purpose and function of TACON, marking it as the correct choice for the question.

In contrast, detailed local direction and control, operational task assignment, and necessary movement or maneuvers for mission completion are integral components of TACON. These elements reflect the operational flexibility needed to achieve success in tactical engagements, where commanders require the authority to direct units precisely within their area of responsibility. Thus, understanding these aspects clarifies why the control over strategic military assets stands out as a point that does not fit the framework of limitations associated with TACON.